
|
The Duncan Sheik Message Board
![]() General
![]() Tricycle PM review
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Tricycle PM review |
|
Springroz Senior Member Posts: 1075 |
Well after an afternoon of rolling around on the floor in my local bookstore’s poetry section, I decided I needed to get a cd and magazine too. So Tricycle, Arthur Rimbaud, and Jeff Buckley MWB went home with me. And how happy I am that they did. Because not only is Jeff’s live cd great, but Tricycle is excellent this month. I encourage everyone to run to Borders or B&N; to get it. A lot of great stuff in there. Some great writing. And a review of PM. So being the nice person that I am and bc I love you guys so much, I am spending part of my holiday weekend typing this for you. It’s worth it. You’re welcome. Enjoy. PS – there is a pic of Duncan as well, for those who are aesthetically pleased by him. Phantom Moon By Dimitri Ehrlich In 1996, when Duncan Sheik released his first album, he made success look easy. But soon there was a backlash, and when his second album failed to sell as quickly as the first, skeptics were quick to pronounce him a one-hit wonder. Some of his strengths worked against hi: The very fact that radio stations had embraced his first single “Barely Breathing” with such runaway enthusiasm undercut the idea that he might be considered a serious songwriter. Then there was the matter of his movie-star good looks. When you’re working in Bob Dylan’s territory, handsomeness can erode credibility faster than an endorsement for Kmart. But Sheiks third and most recent album should help erase any doubts about his place in the musical pantheon. If there were a fork in the road dividing Elvis Presley (above all, a sex symbol and pop icon) and Elvis Costello (a songwriter first and foremost), with the release of Phantom Moon Sheik strides confidently into Costello’s footsteps. While it is no put-down to note that Sheik’s sense of melodic possibility is still dwarfed by Costello’s (the same could be said of nearly anyone who wasn’t a Beatle, and one or two who were), Sheik is following the great British tunesmith in three ways. Most directly, he’s tapped the talents of Kevin Killen, the same engineer Costello used from his first “serious” musical side project, the Brodsky Quartet. Second, while Costello most recently polished his high-culture credibility by paring with mezzo-soprano Sophie von Otter, Phantom Moon finds Sheik collaborating with playwright Steven Sater, a lyrist who helps lend the songs more than a whiff of literary erudition. And third, Phantom Moon has something markedly Anglophilic about it: the chamber arrangements courtesy of the London Sessions Orchestra and references to Trafalgar Square and Shakespeare are only the most overt examples. Ultimately, it is another Briton, the late Nick Drake, who provides the most direct inspiration for this elegiac cycle of paeans to romantic yearning. Sheik has been known to perform Drake’s Pink Moon album live in its entirety, and the title of Phantom Moon is a none-too-subtle reference to his hero. The album opens with a few slow piano chords, a wisp of a song over which Sheik half sings, half speaks the words. In keeping with Drake’s devotion to subtlety and ennui, Phantom Moon finds Sheik turning the volume lower, barely breathing each word into the microphone. The effect isn’t sullen but deeply somber. Too much care and orchestration has been put these ghostly, literary portraits of the exquisite ache of love for it to come off as mournful. But make no mistake, despite moments of real prettiness, Phantom Moon is concerned with only one of the four Noble Truths: the first. Whether suffering has a cause, a solution, or any way of being dealt with never comes up. Instead, the narrator of these songs seems to have accepted that he will remain lost, frozen, in a dream of beckoning mermaid who “spread their wings and lift with pale portrait faces,” as Sheik intones “Sad Stephen’s Song.” Although Sheik is a member of Soka Gakkai International (he met Sater, who directs the Buddhist organization’s arts division, through the sangha), this is an album almost entirely free of explicit references to spiritual practices (which is probably a good thing-few outside of Van Morrison have pulled this off in a pop setting). Only one song, “A Mirror in the Heart,” shifts away from the album’s obsession with existential and romantic loneliness to suggest that the solution to all of the heartache described with such preciousness of Phantom Moon might lie within. Still there is one sense in which a Buddhist lesson can be derived from listening to Phantom Moon: Whether by being delicately chimerical or deliberately uncertain, the music defies grasping, and in that way provides listeners with a good opportunity to practice listening without any solid idea to hold on to. ---------- Can I get a hallelujah? My apologies for any typos. [This message has been edited by Springroz (edited September 02, 2001).] IP: Logged |
|
Blackwuzzy Senior Member Posts: 1567 |
Thank you Springroz. I'll have to read that lastest edition. IP: Logged |
|
BrianJ Senior Member Posts: 32 |
Springroz, You Rock! Thank you for taking the time to type all of that for us to see. We really appreciate it. Take care and have a nice weekend. - Brian IP: Logged |
|
DUNCANStwirler7 Senior Member Posts: 427 |
Hallelujah spring! IP: Logged |
|
Springroz Senior Member Posts: 1075 |
Here is some additional information about Mr. Ehrlich. He is the music editor-at-large for Interview. He is also the author of Inside the Music: Conversations with Contemporary Musicians about Spirituality, Creativity, and Consciousness (Shambhala Publications, 1997). IP: Logged |
|
prettyswtgrl Senior Member Posts: 54 |
WOW, I am moved by the review almost as much as I am by the music! Now see, that was much nicer then ol' "whats his face" in amazon. Obviously this person has a profound and deep appreciation for the art deplicted in PM. Or perhaps an appreciation for S.S. Either way, I can't argue with it. Yes, thank you spring. How very kind of you. I have learned a great deal since signing on with this board. You all seem to have such great and wonderful information. And I lead a very busy life, (as I am sure you all do), and seem to have to steal my moments of solitude, so I have to cram as much as I can. Peace LIZ ![]() IP: Logged |
|
Carly Senior Member Posts: 471 |
That is a very nice review. Much nicer than the idiot at Amazon. Carly IP: Logged |
|
Britt Senior Member Posts: 542 |
Thanks so much Mari!! Excellent review... I definitely want a copy of that issue, but I was thinking of subscribing soon, and they only send out 4 issues a year, I believe, so would I already receive that issue with my subscription or would it start with the next one?? Does anyone here subscribe??IP: Logged |
|
Springroz Senior Member Posts: 1075 |
It does come out every season. I do not subscribe. You can check out their website www.tricycle.com for prices. They will probably answer your "which issue do i get if i subscribe now?" question. It is a very cool site. Spend some time there. It will give u a taste of the magazine. There is an SGI article in there too. I havent read it yet and there is no way in hell im typing that one bc it is a couple pages. You dont have to be a buddhist to enjoy the magazine. I think that if u are a fan of good writing, good story telling, then u will like this. You will always learn something new. [This message has been edited by Springroz (edited September 04, 2001).] IP: Logged |
|
Amy Senior Member Posts: 299 |
Amen to that. The review was great. I agreed with the part where he talks about "Sad Stephen's Song", how the narrator feels frozen and lost. I've always related to that song in the same way when, I'm stuck in my ocean- like subconscious, oblivious to the world around me. Multiple thanks and good wishes to you! peace, [This message has been edited by Amy (edited September 05, 2001).] IP: Logged |
|
Britt Senior Member Posts: 542 |
Thanks Mari!! ![]() I've been checking out the site for a while now... The magazine is great... I definitely a;ready had my mind made up about subscribing... I'll e-mail them about the issue question though...Thanks!! ![]() IP: Logged |
|
wolfspirit Senior Member Posts: 1099 |
So sorry for my late reply. Forgive?? ![]() That was so great to read. Someone who gave Phantom Moon a proper listen - which is, as you've said, to sit and just listen - no expectations. I especially was intrigued by this one quote, apparently a Buddhist lesson, but though I'm not Buddhist, I feel the same way. This reviewer captured Phantom Moon by saying it can't be captured. "Whether by being delicately chimerical or deliberately uncertain, the music defies grasping, and in that way provides listeners with a good opportunity to practice listening without any solid idea to hold on to." Ah, yes. Therein lies the difficulty for the casually generic music critic. An already pre-determined set of expectations one has before the first listen. Hypothetically - "You need me to review Duncan Sheik's new CD? Clue me in quickly here Bob - the guy who stayed on the Billboard Hot 100 for 55 weeks with that Almost Breathing song a few years back that was pretty catchy, right? Nice debut that was! A four star rating by Rolling Stone I believe... Alright, you need my review in by tomorrow night? I'll squeeze in a listen while showering and shaving - and will still have time to throw something together for you by the deadline. I'm sure it will be great. I really thought that Almost Breathing song was very slick and cool." So he listens and hears what he does not expect. And when we hear what we do not expect, or what we ASSUME we will hear - we're left feeling disappointed. And then the review is due that evening. "Well, I guess Phantom Moon kinda sucked. I certainly didn't hear any of the brilliance of of his earlier work, such as 'Almost Breathing...'" Not being fair here, I know. A little presumptuous. I'm no music critic facing a deadline. I certainly had to give that CD a few listens before realizing that there was no resolution to my trying to resolve any of it. Is it correct to say that a Buddhist theory might support that fact that something just "is"? I remember our conciousness debates, Mari. And I agree that some things just "are" because they are. They exist because they do. And Phantom Moon is brilliant because it is an experience like fleeting consciousness. A beginning and an end, with the end also being the beginning. And everything in between just there for the listener's unpretentious random enjoyment. If one is willing and able to remain unpretentious. Thanks Mari. IP: Logged |
|
Blackwuzzy Senior Member Posts: 1567 |
Mari, I missed that review. "Phantom Moon" remains one of the very finest pieces ever written and performed. I hope it will always be within a special part of Duncan's heart and that we may always hear it's whispers. Much love and peace. BW IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|