
|
The Duncan Sheik Message Board
![]() Daylight
![]() experimental or just banal?
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: experimental or just banal? |
|
Daria Member Posts: 3 |
DAYLIGHT seems to me like an interesting experiment gone terribly awry. Musically interesting (for the most part), but lyrically challenged: "I want to decide 'cause it's worth deciding" "She's wearing the T-shirt of my favorite band" "How can you hold a soul ... that shines like gold?" "I will, I won't, I would "Clearly I'm a Genius "I'm awake in the afternoon Were you just rushed? Was this part of the "proscriptive" lyric writing plan? I guess I expected a bit more, but I'm sure there are reasons behind this latest foray that I am not privy to. It's just that you are capable of much more! Good luck finishing up the tour, I hope it goes well. p.s. You might want to take out Joni Mitchell's "For the Roses" and put it on loop and repeat. Listen to the lyrics carefully... Pause ... and then reflect. IP: Logged |
|
wolfspirit Senior Member Posts: 1124 |
Hello Daria. With all due respect for your personal opinion - excuse me. You've posted on Duncan's public message board, so while you have every right to voice your comments, others have every right to comment on your comments. I'm not offended easily. And I'm certainly not someone who is close-minded in my opinions, or in any way vengeful. But Daria, just who do you think you are? If you are a professional music critic, your magazine might be an appropriate place And on his personal website? Please Daria, what is your motive here? Do you really believe Duncan will take anything you suggested seriously, writing in the tone you chose? I've seen a few people with constructive criticisms of Daylight, and I'm sure Duncan expects a degree of that. You can't please all the fans with every song on every record. But NOWHERE on this board have I read any criticism that wasn't done with tact, respect, and in a humble manner. Differing viewpoints and debates surrounding personal tastes and opinions are what make message boards interesting. So you have a problem with the lyrics on Daylight, it appears. They don't measure up to your standards of what Duncan should be writing? There is a simple solution to your troubles - simply don't listen to Daylight! Maybe it's just not your thing - which is fine! But GEEZ! Your words: What's important to me as a fan, Daria, is that Duncan is the one pleased with what he's produced. And I'm sure he's hoping his fans will like and appreciate much of what he's offered. It feels to me that Duncan is really happy and that has come across well on the lyrics throughout Daylight. I enjoy "hearing" him smile. I have never met ANY artist who has such respect and admiration for his fanbase as Duncan. I believe he genuinely wants to know how we feel about his music, the good and the not-so-good. And with that thought Daria, this last bit bothers me: "And feel free to disregard this little review, but if your fans won't be honest with you, then who will?" Please don't assume that Duncan's "fans" would portray honesty toward his work in the fashion you did. I don't believe any true "fan" would say such demeaning things to an artist they truly admire, even if a current work didn't exactly impress them. Put Daylight away and listen to other music that you have loved. I would hope you would be grateful for the joy his music has brought to your life thus far. I humbly apologize up front if anything I've said is out of line because of "reasons I'm not privy to" - but I had to say something. And I certainly apologize to any other fan on this board if I've offended anyone. Otherwise Daria, I wish you and every other Duncan Sheik fan the very best for now and always.
IP: Logged |
|
Storybug18 Senior Member Posts: 367 |
Right on, Wolfie It's okay to criticize, but have a little more tact when doing so. And who is to say that Duncan's fans aren't telling the truth about loving the album? I love Daylight and it's no lie. I like it because of its optimistic tone and light lyrics; it is not an album that makes you pick your brain to death. Yes, Daylight is very different from Duncan's other recordings, but so was Phantom Moon and Humming and so on. No two Duncan CDs are alike in my opinion. Duncan is clearly a musician who isn't afraid to change his style from time to time. The fact that he is willing to take such risks is what makes him a true artist. If you don't care for Daylight, just stick to the other three albums. But don't insult Duncan's efforts to branch out into new territory. Cheers, IP: Logged |
|
duncanfan Senior Member Posts: 963 |
Shari (wolfie), you just became my personal hero!! ![]() That says it all! Tina ------------------ [This message has been edited by duncanfan (edited December 03, 2002).] IP: Logged |
|
wolfspirit Senior Member Posts: 1124 |
Thanks for bringing out those points, Sam. I want to make it clear that I have absolutely NO problem with anyone saying that they just don't particularly care for Daylight, or in saying "this is my least favorite song" - etc. I have least favorites on Daylight too. But there is a colossal difference between constructive criticism and basically saying "Duncan, I don't like Daylight, and here is why I don't think it's good (poorly written lyrics) - and what I think you should do about it (listen to Joni Mitchell and reflect). These words are an insult to Duncan the artist - NOT constructive criticism of Duncan's album "Daylight." And out of respect for Daria, perhaps her intent was to say "I don't like Daylight - IP: Logged |
|
bennyben Member Posts: 29 |
When I read your post Daria, I started to laugh, esp. at the end of your message when you "advised" Duncan to sit there and loop Joni Mitchell. If anyone know's Joni's music, it would be Duncan and he covered Court and Spark by her. He, like Joni, also experiments with alternate tunings which is very rare in today's pop music. I also loved the way you tried inoculate Duncan and everyone else by saying "if your fans won't be honest with you, who will?" What a perfect way to defend yourself before anyone attacks! Now those who disagree with you are in your mind "artistically slow". I don't nec. love ALL of Duncan's music or lyrics, as I stated in a post I started on Start Again where I said, "sorry, Duncan, but I don't buy it", but that's a far cry from actually advising Duncan to listen to Joni Mitchell. I just re-read you post now and I laughed when you still wished him luck on his tour. "Hey look, Duncan, I'm your fan and friend but you suck. What happened, did the producers rush you or something? Atlantic breathing down your neck? Gee, I feel bad for you. Here's my expert opinion and advice..." There is a tradition in Judaism which I think is very profound. If a stranger, in a debate, were to ask a question to someone else, than that person has a right to ask a question to the stranger and get an answer before answering the first question put to him or her. The reason is is that any fool can ask a question and "catch" someone, but a wiseman wouldn't respond unless he knows if the stranger really knew his or her stuff and proved it by answering a return question. If the stranger answered well and demonstrated their education, than the man or woman can then answer the stranger's question. We see this in the New Testament when the scribes and Pharisees would question Jesus. Sometimes Jesus answered but for the most part Jesus responded with a question to the scribes and then they would think of an answer to give him, but Jesus was always five steps ahead of everyone else and they wouldn't answer him, so Jesus wouldn't give an answer to them and this was UNDERSTOOD by all the bystanders. Jesus wasn't trying to get out of answering a question and no ever accused him of it, but instead this was a ancient tradition. In the same way Daria, what are your credentials? Who do you write music for? What are some of your CD's? In order to criticize Duncan like that, you MUST have a pretty posh resume, right? Any fool can criticize someone else, but its when the fool acts smart where one needs to be careful. If you feel so free to say Daylight has gone awry, you also must be free to post your music or artwork or poems or whatever. You're still even free to admit your arrogance and innocence if you have nothing to post or are ashamed to. IP: Logged |
|
MelisaLuvsDuncan Member Posts: 27 |
Alright Benny! I never knew that about Judaism. It's understandable though, don't criticize unless you have something to show in return, something to lay on the table. After all, that's what Duncan does, gives us his beautiful music for ALL to hear, and if someone is going to criticize, they really should have something to show and say "Ok here's my work, your turn. p.s. Duncan PLEASE come to TEXAS IP: Logged |
|
Daria Member Posts: 3 |
Get a grip ... Get a life ... It is only a message board, and mine is but one opinion. I know "fan" signifies fanatical, but give me a break! IP: Logged |
|
Rina316 Senior Member Posts: 120 |
Daria, I'm sure the replies you got from your original message were NOT from fans being "fanatic", but from fans expressing their opinions, just like you did when you started this thread. I admit that I was disappointed in your review of Duncan's artistry, but it's your opinion what can I say... but.... ~Rina IP: Logged |
|
guidinglight Member Posts: 4 |
I have to agree with Bennyben, Wolfspirit, and Rina316. You all definitely made awesome counterarguments regarding Daria's harsh so-called review. Daria, it's ironic and intriguing that you are a fan of Duncan Sheik yet told him it was an "interesting experiment gone terribly awry." Personally, I think the lyrics that you posted out of negative criticism are simply "not for you." I think that they, among many of his lyrics, are beautiful in their simplicity. A song, in my opinion, should not be riddled and jam-packed with SAT words. After all, songs are like poems put to music. Repetition, deep imagery, and rhyme are staples of the genre. I don't think that you are "evil" or anything Daria, but I think that your so-called "review" was a little caustic. A simple phrase like "not as good as his previous work" I think would have sufficed. I think that the problem people and I have is that what you wrote seemed more like your opinion being stated as fact. But after all, "it is only a message board..." I'll agree with you, Daria, that I didn't care for the song "For You" lyrically; I thought the song was too short and too simple for Duncan. Nevetheless, what is so ironic is that I actually think that "Daylight" is Duncan's best next to "Phantom Moon." I guess I would say that it is his best lyrically, and sadly you, Daria, feel the opposite. Perhaps if you listen to "Daylight" more, it will grow on you. I have some advice for everyone though...I don't think that it is necessary to apologize for opinions unless it is known that the person the opinion is directed to is offended. Let's all be open-minded AND not be afraid to voice our opinons BUT be courteous when and how we give our opinions AND enjoy "Daylight" for what it is worth in its style. This especially means you, Daria. This completes MY advice. IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|